Ar^Cs) Of Expertise: rf /tt& AW htSttS
Review commenced st: / / .:. C& A (Time) , AsT/j
Laboratory #{s):
(Date)
/ ^
Examiner(s) & Symbols
Reviewed Not Roviow«d
& D
Reviewed Not Renewed
Materials Reviewed
Trial testimony transcripts) of: M iCHflg-i- /Vf
Testimony Dste&i): /yOT tuJfj
Laboratory Reports);
i
Laboratory Number f£)&Dv-C/£>
Laboratory Number
Laboratory Number: _
Examiner Bench Motes of; |sC$~ C£ W
Laboratory Number: ! Q 3 tL I £) q*tf
/4-
Date
Date
Date
UWwfl WM
Laboratory Number
laboratory Number
Page / of
Review of Laboratory Rjeport(s) and Bench Notes:
1) Did the exminer perform the appropriate tasis in a scientifically acceptable manner, based on the methods,
protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of tiae original examtaatUmts)?
a Yes ^KNo O Unable to Determine
2) Are the fixiunbaiion result set forth in the laboratory rcport(s) supported snd adequately documented in the
bench notes? O Yes &No □ Unable to Determine
Note? Numbered comments are required below or on
additional pages for any or “Unable to Determine” Responses
Review of Testimony:
Note; Numbered ceinments are required below or an
additional pages for any *No" or “Unable to Determine* Responses
a Transcript not available*
3)
Testimony consistent with the laboratory rsport(s)?
c Yes
£lNo
o Unable to Dctermme
r
4)
Testimony consistent with the bench notes?
□ Yes
K’Nq
o Unable to Dstersmua
5)
Testimony within bounds of examiner's expertise?
fCYes
a No
o Unable to Dctcnnine